needs-to-stayThe series · Home
The research

Past results aren’t enough

Strong performers still get cut. Usually because the case looked backward when the decision was about the future.

June 2026 · 4 min read

One of the more sobering findings: a strong track record, on its own, doesn’t protect anyone. Good performers get cut when the case for them is a highlight reel and the decision in the room is about what happens next.

Decision-makers weigh trajectory and fit

SHRM’s guidance on who stays in a reduction is blunt about it: “The top sales employee with a declining book of business or in a declining sector may be less attractive than the fifth highest sales representative who is growing business or works in a strategically important sector.” Criteria, it says, “should reflect factors that will be most important to the ongoing business.”

In other words: present output is table stakes. The persuasive case adds where the trajectory is heading and why this person matters to where the business is going.

Make the forward case explicit

  • Show the trend, not just the total — output and scope growing month over month.
  • Tie them to a priority that isn’t going away — the system, customer, or capability the org is betting on.
  • Back it with documented, visible specifics. Career guidance from Dice is consistent here: documented achievements and current, relevant skills shape how leadership perceives someone’s value.

None of this means inventing a future. It means making the future contribution as concrete as the past one.

Make the evidence-backed case for someone worth keeping.

Build the case →

← All articles